beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 1,00,000 won.
Defendant
O The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2019 Highest 461"
1. Fraud against Defendant A’s P
A. On May 29, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim P by calls from the Defendant’s house located in Mineyang-si Q to the victim P, and “The Nonparty would pay money within 15 days if he/she loans KRW 12 million.”
However, in fact, the purpose of embezzlement and embezzlement of the company's public funds that were previously attended was to prepare the agreed amount, and there was no need to perform the external expenses, and even if borrowed money, there was no intention or ability to repay it.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 12 million from the victim on the same day.
B. On August 16, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s house located in Mineyang-si stating, “When a friendly Gu that operates a building design business closes down, 200 million won capital is paid, and half of the amount may be used. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million, the Defendant would complete the full payment of the borrowed money within 2-3 days prior to the loan.”
However, the fact is not a situation where 200 million won capital was paid out due to the closure of business of friendship, and half of the amount was not more than the situation where the defendant can use, and even if he borrowed money, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a total of KRW 20 million from the victim twice the same day.
"2019 Highest 1268"
2. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendant A was a person in charge of accounting and accounting in Gwangju-si B, and Defendant C was a person who had acquired the insured status of employment insurance as if he had worked in the above company, and the Defendants were married and married.
Defendant
A using the opportunity to take charge of accounting affairs of the above company, as if Defendant O had not worked as an employee of the company from August 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018, the employment insurance is deemed to have been performed.