The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, community service, 120 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment of the court below takes into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case to the victim E and H; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim at the investigation stage; and (c) the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (b) the crime of injury by carrying a deadly weapon of this case was serious since the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victims due to alkinium, which is a dangerous article; and (c) the Defendant committed the crime of interference with business of this case even after the prosecution of the crime of injury by carrying a deadly weapon of this case; and (d) considering the favorable circumstances favorable to the Defendant, it appears that the court below sentenced the sentence lower than the original statutory punishment and suspended execution through discretionary mitigation, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, it appears that the sentence of the court below is reasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.