The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment of the court below seems to have suffered a lot of mental and physical suffering, such as: (a) the defendant's mistake is against the defendant; (b) the fact that the defendant has no history of punishment exceeding the fine is against the defendant; (c) the reason for sentencing favorable to the defendant; (d) the crime like this case harms the State's adequate criminal justice authority; and (e) the crime is highly likely to be subject to criticism as an offense that causes a person without fault to be subject to unfair criminal punishment; (e) the defendant's false report leads to a serious mental and physical suffering; (e) K, I, G, and H, etc. to be arrested as the suspect of robbery in the danger of robbery; and (e) the defendant's application for detention was made; (e) the situation in which the investigation police officer M made a favorable request for an investigation; (e) the defendant was also demanded to receive a large amount of money; (e) the defendant was able to escape life for 2 years and 6 months following the prosecution investigation process; and (e) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment one year due to imprisonment due to the crime in question;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.