A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:05 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 on the street B in front of the Dongri-si: (b) and was urged by C to return home from a policeman belonging to the Griri Police Station of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station called the Defendant, and (b) took the Defendant’s bath to “the Defendant’s failure of her fribbb w w w w w f w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to video recording CDs for crime preventionCCTV (the defendant saw to a police officer, but he denies that he did not bomb, but in full view of the above evidence, the defendant's bomb, as recorded in the facts charged, can be found to be shaken of the police bomb)

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One month to five years;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the obstruction of performance of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] no person shall be subject to the coercion of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations]. The basic area of recommendation, six months to one year and six months.

3. According to the sentence, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle while conducting a funeral service and set a stop with the driver and the pilot, and (b) sent the police officer, who called up 112, without taking his horse, killed the police officer’s flab and flab.

In addition, the records and arguments of the instant case, such as the background and contents of the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant had been punished as a violent crime prior to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and means of the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, are revealed.