All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for the appeal by the prosecutor (the two years of suspended execution in October, and the two years of suspended execution in August) is too unfased and unfair; and

2. The instant crime committed by the Defendants, in light of the following: (a) the Defendants forged or falsified a heat treatment report on a melting device to be supplied to a nuclear power plant; (b) the said part is a part that may have a significant impact on the safety of nuclear power generation; and (c) the Defendants committed the said crime for a prolonged period of up to two years; and (d) the Defendants’ nature of the crime is not weak.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendants led to the confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects their mistakes; (b) the Defendants appears to have no special degree of improvement in the quality of the contact loget itself supplied by the Defendants; (c) the benefits they actually acquired from the instant crimes appear not to be significant; (d) the Defendants were the primary offenders who had no record of criminal punishment; and (e) the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, motive, means and methods of the instant crimes, and circumstances after the instant crimes, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is deemed to be appropriate.

Therefore, the prosecutor's argument is without merit.

3. The appeal against the Defendants by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.