logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2016.06.14 2014나1215
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 23,366,00 against the Plaintiff and its related amount from September 13, 2013 to June 14, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is running a construction business with the trade name of “D”, and around May 8, 2013, the repair work of the E-ground building (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Defendant is the same year during the construction period of the instant building.

6. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the contract amount is KRW 52.8 million and the Defendant’s assertion that the contract amount is KRW 52 million is in conflict with the contract amount set by the end of 28.

(hereinafter “instant contract”).

At the time, the Plaintiff entered into the said construction contract orally with the Defendant, but did not prepare a written contract for construction. However, the Plaintiff presented a written estimate (a total of KRW 52.8 million) of May 8, 2013 as follows.

[Written estimates] A-dong Repair Works: 4 million won for rooftop waterproof(s) works, Denmark and walls, 3.5 million won for 3.5 million won for divers and windows, electrical construction works, 1.2 million won for electrical construction, 3.5 million won for boiler and facilities, 2 million won for bathing rooms and machinery and tools, 2 million won for divers, dr and e-tamp, 2.5 million won for 5 million won for outside toilets, 2.6 million won for septic and equipment works, 3.5 million won for 27 million won for septic and equipment works, 3.4 million won for boiler and equipment, 4.5 million won for divers and boiler, 1 million won for 200,000 won for 200,000 won for 200,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won or more for 20,000 won for 20,00 won or more for 300 won for balcony and 2

B. The Plaintiff was paid KRW 52 million for the construction cost by June 28, 2013 while performing the construction work in accordance with the said contract, and there was a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant regarding the additional construction cost.

The Plaintiff shall attach a written estimate (a total of KRW 2,410,00,000,000 and value added tax) with the following details attached to the instant complaint.

arrow