beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On the Internet, the Defendant: (a) on July 11, 2005, died on the part of the Defendant’s office contact number and address to search for the phone number and officetel for the Defendant’s use; and (b) on the part of the Defendant, it appears that the C lawyer still remains alive and is engaged in the attorney’s activity; (c) upon contact with the clients through the Internet search, the clients for legal affairs had the contact with the clients as if they were the office manager of the said office; and (d) had the Defendant, not the attorney, received money in return for assisting the legal affairs.
1. Around August 201, the Defendant of the Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act proposed the following methods: (a) around August 201, the Defendant: (b) provided that the victim D, who was aware of the Defendant, was the head of the C-at-law’s office; (c) provided the victim D with the victim’s death money E with the victim’s legal counsel with respect to the case where the victim unfairly depriveds his real estate ownership; and (d) sought a criminal complaint regarding this case; (c) around March 2012, the Defendant tried to proceed with a lawsuit for the registration of cancellation of real estate ownership transfer; (d) around that time, the victim was sentenced to guilty judgment of the above criminal case and tried to file a claim for registration of cancellation of real estate ownership transfer; and (e) at around that time, the victim’s civil lawsuit with the above judgment of criminal case may be concluded if he did not appoint, and (e) did not leave the victim’s non-high attorney, and (e) if
The defendant accepted the above proposal around that time, and the same year.
5. A complaint filed with the Seoul Northern District Court 2012Gadan19816 of the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court 2012Gadan19816) for a claim for cancellation of registration of ownership transfer;
7. Around 17.17. Around September of the same year, and around January 9, 2013, a preparatory document of the said lawsuit was prepared and submitted to the said court, respectively.
Accordingly, the defendant is not a lawyer.