logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.12.18 2015고합164
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 22, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to three years and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court. On February 9, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud in the sex support of the Daegu District Court on October 19, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on October 19, 2012. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended execution for six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on April 16, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 24, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

B) On December 2014, 2014, after hearing the phrase “G’s site and building in Ulsan-gun F, Ulsan-gun, U. Ulsan-gun, U. Ulsan-gun, which is already provided as security to the GU and borrowed KRW 500 million from D at a cafeteria, which is located in the Gan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-do, the Busan-do, U. Ulsan-gun, U.S., in order to kill the inspection, the additional loan of KRW 300 million is required.” In collusion with Defendant A to arrange for a loan and receive compensation.

Accordingly, Defendant A promised to arrange for additional loans of KRW 300,000,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative account of H, which is one of the most necessary expenses for the additional loans, and 30,000,000,000 if the loan has been completed, then Defendant B again delivered the loan to D on December 11, 201, and received KRW 7,00,00 from D and received KRW 30,000,00,000 from D if the loan was made.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive money and valuables and promised to receive money and valuables in relation to the intermediation of matters belonging to the duties of officers and employees of financial institutions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant A (including the defendant B's statement);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B (including D’s statement)

1. D. D.

arrow