logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단3025
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 8, 2011, the Defendant, at the Seoul Western District Court, was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a fine of one million and five hundred thousand won for the same crime at the same court on January 28, 2013.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a motor vehicle on the B-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-P.

On November 11, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car as his duties under the influence of alcohol level of 0.198% from blood alcohol level among blood transfusion around 22:45 on November 11, 2015, and continued to drive the said car along the three-lane road in front of the shooting distance in the ethical station in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the direction of the new village from the direction of the river.

Since it is at night at the time, the defendant engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed, properly seeing the front-way and left well, and accurately manipulating the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim C (34) who was under the influence of traffic at the same lane where he was under the influence of alcohol and was negligent, and was driven by the victim C (34) who was under the influence of the signal waiting at the same lane, as the part of the front part of the car in front of the car in the above Saturdays, and due to the corresponding shock, the said U.S. car was pushed in the future and the said U.S. car was under the influence of the signal waiting at the front part of the victim E (51) who was under the influence of the signal waiting vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence, which makes it difficult for the Defendant to drive in a normal manner due to influence of drinking, and injury, such as “the pipe and tension of the wooden part,” which requires treatment between approximately two weeks to the above C, such as “the pipe and tension,” and injury to the injured party G (34 tax) who was on board the said Bosch Rexroth car, such as “the pipe and tension of the wooden part,” which require treatment between approximately two weeks, and the above E requires treatment between approximately two weeks.

arrow