logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고단5522
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:20 on September 16, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties by hearing the words “the citizens of the Busan Northern Police Station D District, who called out after receiving a report that the residents scam scamscamscamscamscams in front of the Busan Northern-gu, Busan Northern-gu, and called “the citizens of the city are scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams,” and assaulted the Defendant by using the parts of the Fman’s right part of the Defendant’s scamscamscams, and bambling the two arms, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

2. 경범죄처벌법위반 피고인은 2016. 9. 16. 00:50경 부산 북구 G에 있는 D지구대에서 제1항 기재와 같이 공무집행방해 혐의로 현행범인 체포되었다는 이유로 불만을 품고 술에 취한 채로 위 D지구대에서 근무하는 경찰관들을 향해 “야이 씨발놈들아, 우짤낀데, 개새끼들아.”라고 고함을 치는 등 약 10분 동안 술에 취한 채로 관공서에서 몹시 거친 말과 행동으로 주정하거나 시끄럽게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance by the head of a government office);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The choice of the punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties shall be punished by imprisonment and a fine for violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Defendant who is disadvantageous to the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow