logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고정1218
상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000, respectively.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, around February 3, 2016, around 00:56, at the street in front of the Defendant’s residence in Dongjak-gu Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Defendant A suffered injury that requires treatment for 28 days due to the high volume high volume high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level high level 50cm on the left side of the Defendant’s house when Defendant A and the victim B demanded to move and request the D Cost She parked in front of the Defendant’s house.

2. Defendant B suffered injury in need of medical treatment for more than 30 days, such as 10 times the victim’s right side, 20 days of 10 days of cage cage cage cage cage cage cages, and 30 days of cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cages on the left side, etc. in opposition to the victim A.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Investigation report (to submit two copies of the diagnosis report of injury to B);

1. Bodily damaged photograph (the fact of judgment No. 2);

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. Investigative report (Submission of a written diagnosis of additional injury to A);

1. The photograph of injury (the defendant A asserts that his act constitutes a legitimate defense or excessive defense as an act with considerable grounds for defending the remainder of the defendant A's act committed by A's assault, but considering the criminal background, form of act, degree and degree of injury recognized by each evidence of the judgment, it is reasonable to view that the defendant A's act does not merely constitute a simple defense for defending an unfair attack, but also has the character of an attack, and therefore it does not constitute a legitimate defense or excessive defense).

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 257 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

arrow