A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the “D” in the 301st floor of the 3rd floor of the Ucheon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

From July 19, 2014 to February 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed seven rooms at the above establishment of approximately 40 square meters from around 19, 2015 to around 40, employed female employees E (one name F) and one name G; (b) provided guidance to the guest room; (c) provided the female employees waiting in the air to the guest room with the amount of KRW 70,00 to KRW 10,000,00,000 from the unexpected customers who found the place; and (d) provided them with information to the guest room; and (e) provided them with the act of similarity by causing the female employees waiting in the atmosphere, such as shakinging or omitting the sexual organ of the guest with his/her hand and the guest’s sexual organ; and (e) assisted the commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Voluntary reports and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of alternative punishment of imprisonment and the concurrent punishment of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had the same record as the sentencing grounds under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the period of business operation, etc., even though the crime is not good, the Defendant has led to confession of and reflect against the instant crime, and the same type of crime as the instant case has been committed again, and the judgment is rendered as per Disposition, taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc.