1. We affirm that the Defendant’s dismissal of the Plaintiff on December 31, 2015 against the Plaintiff is null and void.

2. The defendant shall make the plaintiff 17,680.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: non-strifeed facts, Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply);

(iii) subparagraph (3). Each entry of subparagraph (3) and the purport of the whole pleading

A. On March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff is a company that is dismissed on December 31, 2015 while working for the Defendant on March 1, 2015, and the Defendant is a company that runs a tourist bus transport business using approximately twenty full-time workers.

B. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant concluded a bus agreement with the Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. and “Co., Ltd. bus departure and retirement,” and the Plaintiff was driving the said bus.

C. On August 3, 2015 and October 14, 2015, the Defendant submitted a final statement to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. concerning the Plaintiff’s violation and speed of signal, and on October 5, 2015, the CB Resolution Co., Ltd sent a document stating “request for safe operation of commuting buses” in relation to the Plaintiff’s commuting buses operated by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff used leave from November 5, 2015 to November 10, 2015, the Plaintiff left a transit bus operation to the large arms company. On November 5, 2015, the Plaintiff destroyed the vehicle owned by the Defendant due to the negligence of the large arms company and caused damage, such as repair cost.

E. Around 15:40 on November 15, 2015, a civil petition was received at the women’s office for the transportation petition of the Nancheon Police Station with the purport that the Plaintiff violated the signal.

F. Around 15:50 on December 17, 2015, while operating a transit bus, the Plaintiff temporarily stopped on the side of the D store in the netcheon-si D, and sought cooperation from passengers about signal violation and report, etc., the Plaintiff continued to operate the transit bus after getting off the relevant employee to the police station, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant submitted the closing statement to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

G. While the Plaintiff works under the jurisdiction of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was notified of the imposition of a total of four administrative fines on March 11, 2015, July 25, 2015, August 27, 2015, and December 9, 2015.

H. On December 28, 2015, the Defendant did not comply with the B Private Regulations because it falls short of the qualification to be equipped as a driver of the service type.