beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 20, 2015, from around 09:30 to around 09:50 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s disturbance, such as: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the clothes of “E” operated by the victim D (the age of 47) in Gyeonggi-gun C; and (b) under the influence of alcohol in a sofacing so that he takes the bath of “E” in the sofacing so that he can be seen as “within the limit of 70,000 won,” thereby obstructing the Defendant’s business by force.
2. The Defendant, while avoiding disturbance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, was arrested in the act of committing an act of violence from G on the 112 patrol box, who was called out after receiving the 112 report, and was transferred to the F police box located in Gyeonggi-do Navy H.
On October 20, 2015, at around 09:55, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the Inspector that “I am out of the F box that I am out “I am out of am out of am out of am out of am out of am and am out of am and am out of am and am out of am and am out of am and am out of drinking.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;
1. Each investigation report (CCTV) asserts to the effect that the Defendant was in a mental and physical state, such as being drunkly drunk and not memory at the time when the instant crime was committed under the state of normal alcohol addiction. The Defendant asserts to the effect that: (a) each investigation report (CCTV) was in a state of mental and physical disorder, such as being drunk at the time of committing the instant crime under the state of normal alcohol addiction.
According to the records, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the details of the crime, the attitude of the defendant, and the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, it is not recognized that the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions, or that he did not have the ability to
Even if the Defendant was in a state of mental disorder at the time of committing the instant crime under the influence of alcohol.