The judgment below

On April 201, 201, the fact that the private document was set up in the same section, April 27, 201, the fact that the private document was held on April 27, 201, and the fact that it was around October 2011.

1. The progress of the lawsuit in this case and the scope of the trial for the party after sending back the case

A. The lower court rendered a not-guilty verdict on all the facts charged of the instant case, and the prosecutor appealed on the ground of mistake of fact.

2) Prior to remand, the judgment of the court below is reversed through pleading, and the alteration of private documents around September 201; the use of altered private documents around September 19, 201; the use of altered private documents around October 201; and the use of altered private documents around November 1, 201; the court found the defendant guilty of not guilty on the ground that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the aforementioned alteration of private documents was conducted on April 27, 201; the use of the aforementioned private documents was conducted on April 27, 201; the use of the aforementioned private documents by the public prosecutor around October 201; the use of the aforementioned private documents by the public prosecutor on the ground that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the aforementioned alteration of private documents was made on October 1, 2011 and the use of the aforementioned private documents by the public prosecutor on the ground that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that he was found guilty on the ground that the aforementioned alteration of the private documents was made on April 217, 20.

B. The scope of the trial after the remand is that of this court.