logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.25 2018고단553
위계공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea and was planned to apply for employment and refugee status, Defendant A was willing to enter the Republic of Korea with a visa issued by pretending that he/she was invited for business purposes.

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant requested “D” to make a visa available to the Republic of Korea in the name of “D”, which is a hub for arranging entry into the Republic of Korea for the false issuance of a visa, and the Defendant’s passport, photographic photograph, etc., and the aforementioned “D”, through “E”, intended to purchase a pressure tool from “F company” even though the Defendant did not plan to purchase a pressure tool,” even if the Defendant did not intend to purchase a pressure tool.

Dispatching a letter of invitation, etc. necessary to obtain a visa to determine whether to purchase a product directly;

H. “Along with the foregoing G, the invitation letter, etc. was sent.”

After that, on September 19, 2016, “D” applied for a short-term visit visa (C-3) with respect to Defendant at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea located in the Hague, and was issued a visa unlawfully by submitting a visa issuance document, such as a letter of invitation to the Defendant, which was falsely prepared to the effect that the “F Company” side of the public official in charge of issuing the visa solicits Defendant for business purposes.

Accordingly, in collusion with the above "D", the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the public official in charge of issuing visas belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, and applied for a visa falsely.

2. Defendant B, who was a foreigner of his nationality, was willing to enter the Republic of Korea to apply for employment and refugee status, but was willing to enter the Republic of Korea with a visa obtained by pretending as if he was invited for business purposes.

The Defendant may move to the Republic of Korea from August to September, 2016 to the Republic of Korea under the name of “D”, which is a hub for arranging the issuance of a false visa, in the Hague.

arrow