1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 1, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the welfare card agreement entered into between the Defendant and the new card company (hereinafter “new card”).

B. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the instant agreement would seriously undermine the legitimate interests of the corporation if disclosed as a matter of business secrets of the corporation’s management and trade secrets, pursuant to Article 9(1)7 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection against the Defendant on July 10, 2015, but the Defendant dismissed it on July 24, 2015.

On February 22, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the details of the instant agreement between the instant agreement and the guidelines for the support of the Bo Telecommunication Vehicles and the new card from 2013 to 2015.

E. On March 3, 2016, the Defendant, on which March 3, 2016, announced the Plaintiff that the guidelines for supporting the Bo Twit Vehicle was posted on the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs website, and that the settlement of accounts from 2013 to 2015 was disclosed, but the instant agreement constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)7 of the Information Disclosure Act.

F. On March 9, 2016, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the Defendant on March 9, 2016, and the Defendant made a supplement to the above settlement details, but dismissed this part of the objection on the ground that the decision of non-disclosure on the instant agreement was already made.

G. On April 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the instant agreement and the agreement entered into with the Defendant’s on-going passenger ship company.

H. On May 2, 2016, the Defendant disclosed the agreement entered into with the Plaintiff with the coastal passenger company on May 2, 2016, but with respect to the claim for disclosure of the instant agreement, the Plaintiff already made the same information.