logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.13 2013가단38251
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. 원고의 주장 원고는 피고로부터 2010. 12.경 강원 화천군 C 주택공사 및 방앗간 공사 중 창문 유리 샷시공사를 하도급받아 총 4건의 공사를 공사대금 96,500,000원에 시공하였고, 2010. 12. 7. 남양주시 D현장 공사를 하도급받아 공사대금 5,700,000원에 시공하여 공사를 모두 완료하였으나 총 공사대금 102,200,000원 중 60,500,000원만 지급받고 나머지 41,700,000원은 지급받지 못하고 있다고 주장한다.

2. We examine the judgment: (a) there is no dispute between the parties that the Plaintiff had contracted several construction works from the Defendant and received the construction cost of KRW 60,50,000 in total over several times from the Defendant; (b) further, the Plaintiff did not receive construction cost of KRW 41,70,000 even after completion of subcontracted construction works from the Defendant on December 2, 2010 and December 7, 2010; and (c) as to the fact that the Plaintiff did not receive construction cost of KRW 41,70,000 from the Defendant, the evidence No. 1-2 and No. 2-1, and No. 2-2 are all written statements and estimates prepared by the Plaintiff. Therefore, it is insufficient to acknowledge them only with the written statements written by the Plaintiff, and there is no evidence to acknowledge them otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow