logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.02.01 2010나45561
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where “not” is deleted from No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Determination:

A. The judgment on the claim of the Plaintiff Company (1) was made on January 16, 2004, the Plaintiff Company: (a) before entering into a joint business contract between E department stores and the Plaintiff Company; (b) requested the Defendant to pay school expenses as required by the consent of the directors of E department stores in order to enter into a joint business contract; (c) on November 6, 2003, the Defendant’s mother remitted KRW 2 million to Q account; and (d) on November 13, 2003, the Defendant requested the Defendant to provide funds for the purpose of operating the E department stores; and (c) on June 1, 2004, the Plaintiff Company paid KRW 20 million to the Defendant on January 16, 200; and (d) on June 1, 2004, the Defendant did not incur damages to the Plaintiff Company by facilitating the joint business relationship between E department stores and the Plaintiff Company; and (d) on June 1, 2004, the Defendant did not incur damages to the Plaintiff Company KRW 3 million.

(2) According to each of the statements in Gap's 3 through 7, the defendant's mother's deposit account on November 6, 2003 was remitted 2 million won to the defendant's mother's deposit account on November 13, 2003, and the plaintiffs' management on November 13, 2003.

arrow