1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Facts of recognition

From October 207 to June 2017, the Plaintiff (Appointed hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) resided with Gi-si B apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) 102 Dong 1401, the mother of the Gi-si B apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “the instant apartment”).

The net C died on April 12, 2016, and the Plaintiff and the designated parties inherited the property.

The defendant is the manager of the apartment of this case.

(Reasons for recognition) Facts without dispute, purport of whole pleadings.

Plaintiff’s assertion

Although the entrance door of the first floor of the apartment of this case was frequently broken from November 2009, the defendant did not accept it.

On August 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to sexual harassment several times from E, an apartment security guard employed by the Defendant.

On October 2012, the defendant changed the front juncture of the apartment of this case, and there was an urgent slope between India and pedestrian crossing. Accordingly, the plaintiff, the user of the electric car for disabled persons, was inconvenienceed.

Although the Defendant did not call the Plaintiff at his house in the balcony, the Defendant bullyinged the Plaintiff by making a phone call or attaching a notice of the same content to the Plaintiff before the Plaintiff’s house, etc.

The plaintiff's long-term phenomenon of water leakage in the balcony No. 102, 1301, which occurred, and the defendant unilaterally forced the plaintiff to repair even though it was caused by a mistake in the construction of the city.

The defendant must compensate for the plaintiff's damage caused by such tort and confirm that the plaintiff is not liable for the remuneration in relation to the water leakage in balcony.

Judgment

With respect to the plaintiff's claim for damages, there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the defendant did not repair the breakdown that occurred in the common entrance entrance of the first floor of the apartment without repairing the breakdown.

Therefore, the plaintiff's objection.