The defendant's KRW 459,837,520 to the plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from April 13, 2019 to February 17, 2021.

1. Details of ruling;

A. On August 20, 2015, the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor”) announced a change in the implementation of the “B Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project” pursuant to Article 28(4) of the former Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017) on August 20, 2015, such as the notification of the change in the implementation of the project. (b) The Defendant of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee filed an application for a ruling on the change in the implementation of the project (hereinafter “instant land, etc.”) with respect to the land, etc. subject to expropriation in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee on February 22, 2019, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee on February 22, 2019 determined the amount of compensation indicated in the column of “compensation” in the attached Table, and the date of commencement of expropriation (hereinafter “the date of commencement of expropriation”).

On the other hand, each appraisal, which forms the basis of the instant ruling, determined that “the business shall continue to be operated immediately after relocating the place of business without the suspension period due to the characteristics of the financial institution,” and assessed the Plaintiff’s business loss of the E branch by adding up “the expenses incurred in transferring the business facilities, raw materials, products, and goods, and the amount equivalent to the depreciations incurred prior thereto,” and “the expenses incurred in relocating the place of business, such as relocation advertising expenses, opening expenses,

(c)

The Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee, and on September 26, 2019, the Central Land Expropriation Committee made an objection against the instant adjudication by changing the amount of compensation for the instant land, etc. to the amount indicated in the column for “compensation” in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant adjudication”).

Each appraisal, which forms the basis of the instant judgment, is also the Plaintiff’s E branch as in the instant judgment phase.