The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) did not have inflicted an injury on the victim; (b) did not have inflicted an injury on the victim; and (c) was assaulted on the victim.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant (the penalty amounting to KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances found by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: ① The victim consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, on the ground that the Defendant’s heavy distance within a passenger car driven by C around June 14, 2014, the Defendant stated that “I am ice, I am ice for this year,” on the ground that “I am ice, I am ice,” and “I am ice.”

"............" means the victim's head, and the victim was in a state.

(2) At the time of the operation of the court below, C was the front seat of the defendant, and C was the victim of the damage from the defendant. After the driving of the court below, C was the front seat.

It shows the hole of the chest part.

The statement, ③ the statement of the victim’s injury diagnosis and diagnosis document, and the images of the upper part of the diagnosis document are consistent with the victim’s statement. Although the victim was issued each of the above diagnosis document after the lapse of the heat from the instant case, the victim stated that it was delayed to file a report with the police, waiting for the Defendant’s death. However, the victim stated that it was delayed in the court of original instance, and that it was particularly doubtful in the above statement of the victim or each of the above diagnosis documents issued.