(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고단7311

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고단7311

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 3, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won or more for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on September 3, 2010, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won or more for the same crime on May 22, 2013.

[Criminal facts] On September 24, 2017, the Defendant driven a G Spo-type car under the influence of alcohol with a maximum alcohol content of 0.151% at 0.151%, i.e., G Spo-type, in a state of under the influence of alcohol from the insular land to the 1486 main unit of the wife population at Gpo-si to the next road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs and reports on the situation of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, summary order, and copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of the workhouse - The defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and the defendant has committed this crime even during the period of suspension of execution. - The defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is higher than that of the defendant. - The defendant has no record of being sentenced to punishment exceeding fines for the same crime - The defendant has no record of being sentenced to punishment for the same crime, and the crime under the period of suspension of execution has no record of being sentenced to punishment for the same crime, and the crime under the period of suspension of execution has no record of being sentenced to punishment for the same crime. - The defendant’s identical crime of the defendant has not been concentrated at once in each year of 2010 and each year of 2013. The sentence should be imposed as ordered in consideration

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고단3109

-수원지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고단6617

-수원지방법원 2018.02.02 2016고단6454

-수원지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단2522

-수원지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고단7257