Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service with no license plate 125cc.
On November 5, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license for a motor device bicycle, driven the above Orabab, and proceeded six lanes in front of the Seoul Mapo-gu Officetel in the direction of the same intersection distance from the string distance at the entrance of the red.
Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the entire city and to safely operate the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left without the driver's license and went to the left at three-lanes of the center line due to the negligence of the defendant's failure to go to the left, and the part of the victim C(33 ) driver's driving, which is left to the left, was the front part of the driver's driving.
Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the victim’s driver’s above lebane amounting to KRW 9,951,240.
2. On November 5, 2016, the Defendant driven a bicycle with 125 c motor device without a motor device license in the section of about 1 km from the red-interest University located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu to the road front of the Seoul Mapo-gu Office 20:29, the Defendant operated a bicycle without a motor device license in the section of about 1 km to the two officetels of Mapo-gu Seoul.
3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) a two-wheeled vehicle owner, who is not a number plate No. 125cc., and was not a mandatory insurance policy, operates the two-wheeled vehicle on the road; (b) the two-wheeled vehicle owner is not a mandatory insurance policy; and (c) the two-wheeled vehicle was operated at the
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. C.