beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In a development-restricted zone, only the relevant resident may construct a facility for the convenience of living and living of the residents of the development restricted zone with permission from the competent authority, which is a facility for the convenience of living of and production to the residents of the development restricted zone, and the liquefied petroleum gas filling station for automobiles (hereinafter referred to as "gas filling station") and shall not obtain the said permission by fraud or other improper means.
C, D, and E were gathered to construct and operate gas filling stations and gas filling stations by lending the names of the residents residing in the development restriction area in the Hanam-si of Gyeonggi-do, which is the development restriction area around August 2012, 1971, which was designated as the development restriction area in the Hanam-si of Gyeonggi-do.
1. Defendant A, the mother, who had resided in the development restriction zone in the Southern-si, designated as the development restriction zone around 1971, had been her mother, who had been living in the development restriction zone in the Southern-si, from around 1971, was offered a proposal to lease the name of I to operate a gas filling lawsuit in the above land from D, and was willing to obtain a gas filling permission in the name of I.
On February 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) lent only the name of I to C; and (b) filed an application for permission to construct gas charging stations via D as if I were to construct gas charging stations although I had no intention or ability to construct and operate gas charging stations; and (c) obtained permission to construct gas charging stations from the subcontractor market on July 2, 2015 to the owner of the building.
As a result, the Defendant was permitted to engage in development activities in a development restriction zone by false or other unlawful means.
2. Defendant B was a person who had resided in the development restriction area in the sub-Si from before 1971 that was designated as the development restriction area of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-Si of the sub-party B and was offered a proposal