1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B shall be dismissed.

2. Defendant A and the Plaintiff jointly and severally with Nonparty C, KRW 209,357,533.

1. Basic facts

A. Party C’s relationship 1) From April 8, 1990 to December 18, 2002, E-credit cooperatives (hereinafter “E-Agreement”)

As the president of the Association, the overall tasks of the Association, such as deposits, loans, and the management of the funds of the Association, were comprehensively controlled. D, from April 6, 1990 to September 21, 200, was in office as a full-time director who is a working-level director for the EM, and Defendant B, from February 14, 1994 to September 25, 2001, was in office as an E-M auditor from March 1999 to April 7, 200, respectively. 2) The LF died on April 7, 200 when it was in office as an auditor for the E-M, and Defendant A solely succeeded to the netF’s property.

3) On June 12, 2003, EF was declared bankrupt by the Daegu District Court, and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as bankruptcy trustee on the same day. (B) On the same day, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a lawsuit seeking damages under the Daegu District Court Decision 2003Gahap15772, Daegu District Court 203, 203, asserting that the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation purchased shares of EF in violation of the Credit Unions Act against the president C, executive D, and Defendant B, etc., and illegally operated the EF’s surplus funds by purchasing shares in violation of the Credit Unions Act, and that the EF would incur property damage to EF as a partner’s

(2) The court of first instance held in the previous lawsuit that C and D suffered property damage to E, due to the unfair purchase of beneficiary certificates. The deceased F, as an auditor of E, was delegated by the board of directors to prevent or prevent the purchase of the above beneficiary certificates, and the defendant B, who was delegated by the board of directors, led to the purchase of the above beneficiary certificates. If the defendant B performed his duties as an auditor, he was found to have been able to easily understand the illegal operation of the above surplus funds, and on December 16, 2004, recognized that the defendant A, the heir of the deceased E-consultation Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, was not 70,000,000, and the defendant B, the defendant B, as the heir of the deceased F, was jointly and severally entrusted with C and severally with C.