1. The part concerning the claim for the implementation of the procedure for registration of ownership preservation among the instant lawsuits is dismissed;

2. Defendants B, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P.

1. Indication of the claim: The description of the "the grounds for the corrected claim" in the attached Form.

2.(a)

Defendant C, K, and N: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. The remainder of the Defendants except the above Defendants: the judgment based on the self-concrimination (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. As to the legitimacy of the claim for the execution of the procedure for registration of preservation of ownership of a building listed in the separate sheet among the lawsuits in this case, the plaintiff can apply for registration of preservation of ownership on behalf of the heir of the network new scrap, registered as the first owner in the building ledger of the building unregistered in the separate sheet. As such, the part of the claim for the execution of the procedure for registration of preservation of ownership among the lawsuits in this case is unlawful because there