The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, the community service order 120 hours, the probation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant is still a juvenile, and the fact that it seems that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and that the total amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is relatively little, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, it is difficult to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed the instant special larceny crime that steals the victim G by combining F with F; (b) the Defendant committed the instant special larceny crime that steals the victim G; and (c) the Defendant committed the unlawful use of the cream card that stolen from the above G G’s wallet; (d) the victims’ damages incurred from the instant crime still appears not to have been properly recovered; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly even though there are many past records of having received juvenile protection dispositions due to the same kind of crime; and (c) other all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant argument, including the Defendant’s character, conduct, environment, and family relationship.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.