Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part of conviction, including the acquittal of the reasons for the defendants, shall be reversed.

Defendant

A.

1. The progress of the instant case and the subject matter of the trial of the political party after remand;

A. The summary of the judgment of the first instance court (1) found guilty of the Defendants guilty only of the charges on advertisements that are not included in synthetic chemical ingredients posted on the website of Defendant H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) around October 208, among the following: (a) the Defendants’ violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act related to the operation of multi-level marketing organizations without registration (hereinafter “Door-to-Door Sales Act”) and the part between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007; and (b) the Defendants’ violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act and the Cosmetics Act.

(2) On the other hand, the first instance court found the Defendants not guilty of the violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act related to the operation of a multi-level marketing organization from October 2003 to December 31, 2005, and the part concerning door-to-door sales related to the operation of a multi-level marketing organization without registration from January 1, 2008 to November 10, 2008, ② Defendants' violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act, around July 2005, around July 2006, around 2008, around 2008, and the violation of the Cosmetics Act, and the violation of the Cosmetics Act, around October 2008, and the violation of the said Act, which misleads the Defendants to the facts that the advertisements were not included in the synthetic chemical ingredients posted on the Blobbbb, around October 2008, and the violation of the said Act.

B. On the summary of the judgment of the court of first instance prior to the remand, the Defendants violated the Door-to-Door Sales Act on the misunderstanding Advertisement by the Defendants.