1. The Defendant: 8,640,099 won to Plaintiff A; 7,454,432 won to Plaintiff E; 7,764,367 won to Plaintiff F; and 4,352.

1. The plaintiff B, C, D, H, J, K No. 2-2, Gap evidence 3-2, Gap evidence No. 4-2, Gap evidence No. 9-2, Gap evidence No. 10-2, Gap evidence No. 14, Eul evidence No. 14, Eul evidence No. 14, Eul evidence No. 1, 5, and 6, comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings, the plaintiff No. 2, C, D, E, H, H, H, H, H, K, M, and N (13 persons other than plaintiff G) did not directly claim against the defendant for the return of the above claim No. 10, 2012, 202167, and 2, Gap evidence No. 10-2, 2, 10-2, 10-2, 2, 2, 30-1, 2, 30-1, 2, 30-1, 2, and 4, 2016.

According to the above facts, Plaintiff B, C, D, H, J, and K received the claim from the buyer first prior to the closure of pleadings in the previous suit, and was delegated with the authority to notify the assignment of the claim to the Defendant, and notified the Defendant of the notification of the assignment of the claim. Although the Defendant did not notify the Defendant of the assignment of the claim before the closure of pleadings, and received a dismissal judgment in the previous suit for this reason, even if the Defendant did not notify the Defendant of the assignment of claim before the closure of pleadings, the notification of the assignment