The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the instant crime was administered once, that the Defendant is against the duty to report, that the instant crime was recognized by the Defendant’s report, and that the relationship with the Defendant’s family members and the siblings appears to be obvious is the circumstances favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that there are many previous departments, including the Defendant’s punishment, and about 4 months after having been discharged from the previous department of punishment on March 13, 2014, the Defendant appears to be dependent on the Defendant, and that there is a need to isolate the Defendant from the harmful environment for a certain period of time, and the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by fully taking into account the aforementioned overall circumstances, and taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unfairly heavy.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.