beta
Text
1. The defendant,
(a) Attached List;
2. As to the stated real property, between the Plaintiff B and the Korea Housing Finance Corporation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is a cooperative established to promote the reconstruction of “Jitreging” on the apartment building on the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment site (hereinafter “the instant apartment site”), and the Plaintiffs are members of the Defendant Union, who were the sectional owners of “Jitreging.”
B. On June 18, 2003, the Defendant Cooperative entered into a contract for reconstruction with the Dong-gu Comprehensive Housing Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dong-gu Construction”), and the members, including the Plaintiffs, agreed to purchase each unit of reconstruction apartment unit through lot.
In around 2004, the Plaintiffs entered into a supply contract for the “L Apartment” allocated by drawing lots between the Defendant Union and the Plaintiffs.
C. However, around November 2004, reconstruction construction of the above L Apartment was suspended due to the bankruptcy of the Dong-gu construction.
On June 8, 2005, the Defendant Mutual Aid Association concluded a construction contract with the construction of a “M” apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) again with a “Petitions Construction” company (hereinafter “Petitions Construction”).
At this time, members, including the plaintiffs, agreed to recognize the Dong, lake, and area allocated from existing L Apartments by drawing as they are in the apartment of this case.
Accordingly, on September 4, 2006, Plaintiff A, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I concluded each contract for the sale of each unit of the instant apartment units listed in [Attachment 1-9] to purchase each unit of the instant apartment units listed in [Attachment 9]. D.
The apartment of this case was already completed at least 99% in September 2007, and thereafter the construction was completed to the extent that it is possible to move into at a certain point, but the boundary of the neighboring land was actually completed, but the creditors of the defendant association against the land of this case and the apartment of this case are not required to register the restriction of rights, such as provisional seizure, and due to other circumstances.