All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 6 months, and Defendant B: imprisonment for 8 months) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor (Defendant A) violated the Act on Corporate Governance of Financial Companies Violating Acts and subordinate statutes (hereinafter “Act”), and did not separately render a judgment on the violation of the Act on Corporate Governance of Financial Companies.

(2) The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Unlike Article 31 of the Act that provides for the requirements for approval of change to a person who intends to be a major shareholder (the major shareholder of a financial company is divided into the largest shareholder and the major shareholder) by acquiring shares issued by a financial company to determine the violation of law by a prosecutor, Article 32 of the Act provides for the requirements for maintaining eligibility for one largest shareholder among the largest shareholders of a financial company that has already acquired the status of a major shareholder through the aforementioned approval of change. Article 32 of the Act provides for separate review and declaration under Article 31 of the Act, and Article 32 of the Act does not provide for separate review and declaration under Article 32 of the Act, and Article 31 does not provide for separate review and determination under Article 32 of the Act, and Article 32 (6) of the Act provides for separate review and determination under Article 32 of the Act. Article 32 of the Act provides for the purpose of "a crime arising from a violation of the finance-related Acts and subordinate statutes under Article 2 subparagraph 7 of the Act, as well as the provision for prompt review and determination under Article 2(1) of the Act.