1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. We examine ex officio the lawfulness of the instant lawsuit.

On October 30, 200, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking confirmation of the fact that the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant, claiming that the Plaintiff had purchased the real estate listed in the attached list No. 1 from the Defendant in accordance with the content stated in the attached list No. 2. 2.

However, in order to recognize the benefit of confirmation in a lawsuit seeking confirmation of legal relations, it should be caused by any danger or omission existing in the claimant's rights or legal status according to such legal relations, and in order to eliminate such danger or omission, it is necessary to immediately confirm by a judgment of confirmation subject to confirmation of legal relations, and it should be the most effective and appropriate means (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da93299, Feb. 25, 2010). The plaintiff's seeking confirmation as the plaintiff's filing of the lawsuit in this case is merely the past facts and contents of the contract of sales and purchase of the plaintiff's assertion, and therefore, it cannot be deemed that there was any danger or omission that the plaintiff's rights or legal status are existing in the plaintiff's rights or legal status. Thus, the lawsuit in this case has no

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the instant lawsuit is unlawful and thus dismissed.