Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 18, 2015, the Defendant, at around 02:10 on December 18, 2015, the victim J (45 tax) who is an employee of the main station in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the drinking value payment, Gakn's cell phone makes the head of the victim's cell phone and met the face of the victim by drinking.
Accordingly, the defendant suffered bodily injury such as tear tear, etc., where the number of days of treatment can not be known to the victim.
Around 02:00 on February 2, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately 2 km from the front of a restaurant in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road of the Gangnam-gu Samsungdong 172-66, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, without a vehicle driver's license.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 Highest 876"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police to J;
1. Investigation report (related to the statement of telephone conversations with shot lines);
1. Photographs at the time of damage referring to 2016 Mano 925;
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;
1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm) of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense, Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license);
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;
1. That the defendant agreed with the victim on the reason of sentencing as prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 (within the scope of the term of punishment plus the maximum term of punishment prescribed for each crime) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes shall be considered as the circumstances favorable to the defendant.
However, even though the Defendant had been punished several times as a suspended sentence or a fine due to the same type of injury, such as drinking, driving without license, etc., the Defendant again committed the instant injury and driving without license without being aware of it.
Unlike this case, a sentence of bodily injury is imposed and currently pending in the appellate trial. In light of the criminal records, etc. of the accused, the accused, as well as the acts of transportation-related criminal law without any specific distance, is strong.