The judgment below

Among the crimes of No. 1 in the holding of the court below and the crimes of No. 2 in the holding of the court below, from July 5, 2018 to July 7, 2018, and August 15, 2018.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The defendants (e.g., 6 years of imprisonment with prison labor and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for defendant A) are too unreasonable.

[Defendant A’s statement of grounds for appeal as of July 22, 2019, statement of grounds for appeal as of July 30, 2019, statement of objections from July 30, 2019, statement of objections from July 31, 2019, and statement of objections from July 31, 2019, stating that the crime of this case was committed in the state of mental disorder, and the statement of grounds for appeal as of July 22, 2019, which was submitted by Defendant B, state that the crime of this case was committed in the state of mental disorder. However, the Defendants asserted only unfair sentencing on the first day of the court of appeal as of July 22, 2019, and only stated that the allegation of mental or physical disorder was intended to be considered in consideration of sentencing. In particular, Defendant A submitted to the court of the second day of this court that there was an unreasonable error in the misapprehension of legal principles on the grounds for appeal from the court of appeal as of October 14, 2019.

We examine ex officio the part concerning the number of crimes of No. 1 of the judgment of the court below prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal.

The lower court, among the facts charged in the instant case, found Defendant A twice and Defendant B once, using the victim’s failure to resist jointly and by taking advantage of the victim’s failure to resist.