beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's motion to intervene in the case shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiffs' claims and the plaintiff's successor intervenor.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s Intervenor was notified of a lawsuit seeking compensation between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant on the part of the Plaintiff’s Intervenor regarding the legitimacy of the Plaintiff’s motion for intervention in the lawsuit. According to this, the Defendant and the Defendant’s Intervenor asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff’s Intervenor would intervene in the lawsuit of this case as a result of the quasi-joint and several liability relationship. As such, in order to participate in the lawsuit of this case, there is an interest in the outcome of the lawsuit in question. In fact, the interest in this context refers to not an economic or emotional interest but a legal interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 9Da26924, Sept. 8, 200). Thus, solely on the above grounds asserted by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff’s Intervenor directly received the judgment of this case, or on the premise of the instant judgment, the legal status of the Plaintiff’s Intervenor cannot be deemed as having been determined based on the premise that the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s assertion alone does not constitute a legal interest in the requirements for intervention.
Therefore, the motion for intervention by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor is unlawful.
(In addition, in the same context, the plaintiffs' notice of lawsuit against the plaintiffs' Intervenor is also unlawful). 2. Basic facts
A. At around 11:20 on May 11, 201, Plaintiff A suffered 4 degrees of electrical, visual, and impossible completion of treatment on the right side side of the Defendant’s aggregate crushing site located at H, Namyang-si, from an accident that was involved in the high voltage current of 22,905, while going on the street for the slve work related to electrical connecting work (hereinafter “instant work”). Plaintiff A suffered 4 degrees of electrical, visual, and impossible completion of treatment.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
Plaintiff
A is a member of the Defendant in relation to the instant accident.