logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고정328
청소년보호법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the head of the “D” office of the entertainment main office located in the Heung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Young-gu.

The owner of a business harmful to juveniles shall not employ juveniles.

Where a business owner of a juvenile harmful business establishment intends to employ an employee, he/she shall verify the age in advance.

Nevertheless, on September 28, 2016, the Defendant employed 30,000 won per hour without confirming the age of juvenile E at the above businesses around 01:05.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Certifications and written statements of E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of administrative measures to regulate E face photographs and custom business places, business permits, control reports on business places, a detailed statement of reported cases in 112, video data, and details of issuance thereof;

1. Article 58 of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense and Articles 58 subparagraph 4 and 29 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles who have electively sentenced to a penalty;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) reflects all the circumstances, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession under this Act and failure to implement accurate verification procedures as to whether the Defendant was a juvenile; (b) the Defendant’s employee was 18 years old at the time of the instant case; and (c) the Defendant was a primary offender without any other criminal record; and (d) the background leading up to the instant crime;

arrow