1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant Medical Foundation”) is a non-profit medical institution that operates the F Hospital located in Ulsan-gun E (hereinafter “instant hospital”), and Defendant D is a person who works as a father and a medical specialist at the instant hospital.

The plaintiffs are married with each other, and the plaintiff A is unable to communicate with China through Korean language.

B. On July 11, 2013, Plaintiff A complained of the symptoms of her husband, and visited the instant hospital with Plaintiff B, the husband, to undergo a medical examination by Defendant D. The Defendant D, for the diagnosis of whether it is pregnant, by means of diagnosing whether it is pregnant according to the quantity of hCG, HCanmencopin (HCG and HCanmencopin) that is found in the urine of the test and the urine of the urine test to the Plaintiff for the diagnosis of whether it is pregnant. In the case of pregnancy, the her quantity increases and the response would result in training.

(U-HG) was implemented, and as a result of the trophym test, it was impossible to find pregnancy bags in the womb, and found a weak training reaction as a result of urine test.

As such, Defendant D’s normal early pregnancy, natural heritage, and natural pregnancy of an out-of-the-counter pregnancy to the Plaintiffs, while being taken in the modified womb, is a phenomenon that is being taken in other parts, such as an infertility, spacopic spacific spacific spacife, spacific spacife, spacific spacific spacife, spacific spacif

Since there is a possibility and it is difficult to confirm the possibility of early malphism, it is possible to confirm exactly each two days, so that pregnancy is increased if it is conducted by means of diagnosis of whether it is pregnant according to the quantity of blood tracking-cG, which is detected by blood tracking test by blood administration, and in the case of stigma, the test value will not be reduced even after stigma.

(B-HG explained to the Plaintiffs as necessary, and the Plaintiff A, after undergoing blood tests, again, on July 13, 2013 and on the 15th of the same month.