Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2017, at around 00:45, the Defendant: (a) 112 of the “D” entertainment week located in Yong-gu, Suwon-si; (b) Sheeted the police officers, such as E, in order to find out the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant she was dissatisfied with the drinking value test at around 00:45; and (c) Sheeted with E, in order to find out the background of the instant case; (d) Sheet the beer’s disease; and (e) Ha took three times the chest of E as her head; and (e) E took three times the left finger.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning violence against victims, photographs of parts of the victim and field photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Serious punishment should be imposed as an offense of violence to police officers who perform their duties with the justifiable reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

On the other hand, however, a contingent crime is a person who has no record of criminal punishment and is seriously against a person who has no record of criminal punishment, and the victimized police officers want to take the seat of the defendant by committing the crime against the victimized police officers.

In light of the above circumstances, the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act are determined as follows.