beta
Text
1. Defendant Na Baz, Inc., and Rose of Sharon Trust Co., Ltd. are jointly conducted between the Plaintiff and B.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (i) On June 29, 2012, the Plaintiff loaned 2 billion won to B on June 29, 2012 at the rate of 2.43% of the base interest rate of 2.43%, and on June 29, 2015.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant loan claim”). B Sheshe lost the benefit of time due to the failure to pay interest after December 24, 2012.
Article 12(1) of the Act provides that “The principal and interest of the instant loan claim shall be collected from the Plaintiff on January 27, 2014, and KRW 1,198,862,90 on July 31, 2014, and KRW 157,612,00 on July 31, 2014, shall be appropriated for the principal and interest of the instant loan claim, and the principal and interest of the instant loan claim shall be KRW 1,156,652,585 (the principal and interest thereof shall be KRW 660,607,792) shall remain as of July 31, 2014.
B. (1) On March 20, 2012, B entered into a contract on accord and satisfaction between Defendant B and Defendant NaNDz (hereinafter “Defendant NaND”) with Defendant NaNDD on: (a) entered into a sales contract with Defendant NaNDD on the terms that sell the instant land as KRW 10.5 billion; and (b) paid KRW 7 billion out of the purchase price.
B. On March 23, 2012, Defendant Liber Flaz entered into a contract for accord and satisfaction with the following contents (hereinafter “instant contract for accord and satisfaction”) in order to pay the balance of KRW 3.5 billion out of the purchase price with B, and on March 20, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court entered into a real estate sales agreement between the parties to Article 1 of the Seoul Central District Court with respect to the land of this case on March 23, 2012, and concluded between Defendant Liber Flaz on March 20, 2012, with respect to the remainder of KRW 3.5 billion, the right to sell the main multi-story 1 commercial building (exclusively 60 square meters) newly constructed on the relevant real estate may be transferred to B, instead of paying the outstanding amount, and the nominal owner of the right to sell the land may be a person designated by B:
Article 2. Defendant.