A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in a business of raising funds from many and unspecified persons without obtaining authorization therefor or obtaining registration or reporting thereon in accordance with other Acts and subordinate statutes, and engage in a similar receipt of investments, such as receiving investments, by the agreement to pay the total amount of investments or an amount in excess thereof in the future.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as a fund-raising source of “C,” and “D,” a similar recipient company, failed to obtain authorization or permission pursuant to the relevant laws and regulations, with F, etc., as a domestic top-class investor of the above C, and as an overseas top-class investor of the foregoing D.

1. C-related receiving crime: (a) around June 2014, at H hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G G, the Defendant is a specialized securities company specializing in trading in the Red bean, Taiwan, and the FX-related branch in Singapore, which has a branch in Singapore; and (b) resulting in high profit by trading in the FX-related transaction by receiving investment from its members.

C The FX M&M trading profit will be paid to C. If US$ 1,000 is invested, US$ 3% per month, US$ 5,000 per month, US$ 10,000 per month, US$ 6% per month, US$ 20,000, US$ 7% per month, US$ 30,000 will be paid for 18 months, and US$ 30,000 will be refunded as it is.

The payment of investment money shall be made as a member, and an individual account is established on the website, and the details of investment money and dividends can be confirmed in the Gu account.

“The current status of operation of C and the method of paying principal and dividends on investment funds, etc.” A explained to the effect that they were “A” and received KRW 10,590,000 from the said I via the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant (J) around August 8, 2014.

In addition, the defendant in collusion with the above E and other influences, as shown in the attached Table 1 table from March 20, 2014 to May 8, 2015.