1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,145,560 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from April 1, 2019 to June 21, 2019.

1. In light of the overall purport of the pleadings in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and in part of Eul evidence Nos. 1, as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff may be acknowledged that the plaintiff paid KRW 30 million out of the total sum of the above rent processing amount of KRW 80,145,560 on January 16, 2019, to the 2,90 (excluding value-added tax) per two times as shown below, from the defendant who operates an exclusive clothing processing company with the trade name "C" for the purpose of wholesale and retail business in Korea.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 15,319 2,90 44,425,100,442,510,867,610 29,805 2,900,434,500,843,450 277,277,950 30,145,560 30,000 30,145,560 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,560 50,000 0,00 50,00 50,00 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,145,560,000 0,000 20,000 26,000 16,000 20,00 2.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. As to this, the Defendant asserted that he only traded with E running a business entity called “D,” and that there was no transaction with the Plaintiff. However, if the Defendant’s partial entries of the evidence No. 1 are insufficient to reverse the fact of recognition under paragraph (1). Rather, in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in compliance with paragraph (1), the above E is temporarily located in the same place of business as “C” operated by the Plaintiff upon receiving a request from the Plaintiff on July 23, 2018 as an employee of the Plaintiff for the delivery of new business registration in its name.