logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.06.27 2018나66836
위탁운영금반환
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the modification of part of the judgment of first instance as follows.

7 pages 16-17 of the first instance judgment shall be deleted, and the following parts shall be added thereto:

[2] The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s 10th day of suspension of the Plaintiff’s 1st day of operation was immediately seeking manpower to operate the store of this case, and that the Defendant was removed from all member stores in C, and that the Defendant’s 30.8th day of operation of the store of this case was lost in full due to the Plaintiff’s 10th day of closure of the store of this case’s 10th day of operation (from October 17, 2017 to 19th day of closure of the store of this case’s 20th day of closure of the store of this case’s 10th day of closure of the store of this case’s 10th day of closure of the store of this case’s 10th day of closure of the store of this case’s 10th day of closure of the business, but the Defendant’s 2nd day of sale of the store of this case’s 30.8th day of sale of the store of this case’s 10th day of sale of this case’s day of this case’s day of sale

arrow