logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.08.13 2014고단1400
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 4 months, and Defendant D’s fine of 2,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a telecom with the trade name of "E", and Defendant B is an employee in charge of the business of the above telecom, who was sentenced to six months of imprisonment on March 18, 201 due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) in the Goyang branch of the Jung-gu District Court on March 18, 201 and completed the execution of the above sentence in a medical prison on August 12, 201, Defendant C is an employee of the above telecom, and Defendant D is a commercial sex offender of the above telecom.

1. Defendant A, B, and C run a business in a way that, from April 4, 2013 to March 21:25, 2014, the fiveth floor of the Fela-gu in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Defendant A installed five smuggling equipped with beds necessary for commercial sex acts, shower facilities, etc., and employed the women engaged in commercial sex acts, such as D, as female employees, under the condition that 60,000 won per customer would be 60,000 won, and provided them with 110,000 won for female sexual intercourse. Defendant B, from around December 30, 2013 to around March 21, 2014, and Defendant C, from around March 10, 2014, had them work as the employees of the above trading room and provided them with 110,000 won sexual intercourse with each customer and provided them with sexual sex acts.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts for business purposes.

2. Defendant D, from March 8, 2014, worked as a female employee of the above rest room from around March 8, 2014, Defendant D, on March 12, 2014, was engaged in sexual intercourse with 40 male descendants on the condition that 60,000 won per customer is provided.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect A and B by the prosecution;

1. Each statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (report on previous records of disposition, results of confirmation, and confirmation of the date of release);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A, B, and C:

arrow