logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.18 2014노1567
사기
Text

All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for the defendant, 2 million won, 1 million won, 700,000 won, 1 million won, and 70,000 won, sentenced by the court below of the second instance, all of which are sentenced by the court below.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant's ex officio, the case of 2014No1567 of this Court, which is the appeal case against the judgment of the court of first instance, the case of 2014No2051 of this Court, which is the appeal case against the judgment of the court of second instance, and the case of 2014No257 of this Court, which is the appeal case against the judgment of the court of second instance, was consolidated in the procedure of the party hearing. Each crime of the judgment of the court below is in a concurrent relationship under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and thus, the single sentence shall be imposed within the scope of aggravated concurrent crimes pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Thus, the judgment of the court of

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the grounds for appeal by the defendant, and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence admitted by this court is that the facts charged and the summary of the evidence are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act, with the exception of both “1. previous records” in the summary of the evidence of the judgment of the court below as “1. previous records” and “each of the judgments of the court below.”

Application of Statutes

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant is against the recognition of all of the crimes of this case, and is economical.

arrow