The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination factors are sentencing factors favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant has several times of violent crimes and non-licensed driving crimes, and the defendant has two times of previous crimes, and the defendant has been sentenced to punishment in 2015 due to joint injury, drinking driving, unlicensed driving, etc., and accordingly, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, and caused an accident during drinking and non-licensed driving, etc. are elements for sentencing disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, the lower court did not change the sentencing conditions that may be newly considered in this court compared to the lower court, comprehensively taking into account the above factors of sentencing.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, criminal records, motive and circumstances leading to each of the instant crimes, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.