logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.12.19 2016가합46553
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff A’s status as the parties to the dispute is the Ianando Hospital located in Busan Hagu Ha (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Defendant medical corporation F (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) is a legal entity that operates the Defendant hospital, and the Defendant G is a medical specialist who has performed the said hospital in favor of the Plaintiff at the Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff B is the wife of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C, D, and E is the child of the Plaintiff A. The Defendant medical corporation F (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”).

B. (1) On December 14, 2015, Plaintiff A complained of the euthanasia to the Defendant Hospital. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital decided that the euthanasia was a freeropic urology, and decided that the euthanasia was given priority to observe the progress. (2) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the euthanasia to the Plaintiff on December 14, 2015; (2) on January 21, 2015; (3) on January 4, 2016; and on January 6, 2016, 2016; and (4) conducted the euthanasia’s test, euthanasia, euthanasia, and euthanasia’s surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”). On January 8, 2016, the Defendant Hospital performed the instant surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”).

3) On January 10, 2016, Plaintiff A, after the instant surgery, was found to have been infected by melting sudomosa as a result of an equal cultivation examination conducted by the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital around that time. 4) Although the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital provided guidance to Plaintiff A, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital did not show the symptoms of each of the depression.

C. The current state Plaintiff A’s current state is a real name of the friendly proposal, and there is no possibility of recovery from eyesight.

Relevant medical knowledge 1) Free dynasium rasium rasium rasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium lasium, vesium lasium lasium, vesium lasium, artificial insemination lasium, etc.

arrow