logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.06.02 2015고단305
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on March 26, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on September 14, 2012, respectively.

On April 19, 2015, around 14:40, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.181% in blood alcohol concentration from the front of the Dobong Elementary School located in Gyeyang-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Gangwon-do to the front road of the home flusium in the Gangseo-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the state of standing;

1. An inquiry into the enemy and driver's license;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification reports of the same type of crime records) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation, community service, and lecture attendance order, even though the defendant had a record of punishment four times due to drinking driving, he again driven under influence.

However, his mistake is against himself.

In consideration of these circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow