logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.06.19 2013고단163
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On July 21, 1999, at around 14:52, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated the said vehicle with limited weight exceeding 10 tons from B’s truck at the business office of the Korea Highway Corporation (Masan Tolopt) 160-5, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating the said vehicle with limited weight exceeding 10 tons from B’s truck.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; and the summary order of KRW 300,000 was notified and finalized in this court.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation" shall be imposed on the Constitutional Court [the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 shall be imposed on the corporation]. The above provision of the above Act, which is applicable provisions of the facts charged, has retroactively lost its effect.

3. According to the conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of the defendant is publicly notified pursuant to Article 58(2)

arrow